Wednesday, September 27, 2006

- 71 Arrested At Anti-War Protest in Washington

TODAY'S DEMOCRACY NOW!:

* Iraq War Veteran Plans A Protest Walk Across Utah, the Reddest State in
the Country *

Army reservist Sergeant Marshall Thompson spent a year in Iraq working as a
military journalist. He reported from across Iraq, interviewing thousands of
US soldiers. Now back home in his native Utah, he is planning a 500-mile
walk across the state to protest the war and call for a withdrawal of US
troops.

Listen/Watch/Read
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/27/146243


* An Interfaith Discussion On War and Fundamentalism *

As we broadcast from Denver, Colorado Democracy Now speaks to Ibrahim
Kazerooni, a Muslim imam who fled Iraq in the 1970s, and Robert Prince, a
Jewish professor and community leader. Both guests have been working for
peace from within their communities.

Listen/Watch/Read
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/27/146248


* Ward Churchill Defends His Academic Record & Vows to Fight to Keep His Job
at University of Colorado *

We speak to the well-known academic and writer Ward Churchill about his
future at the University of Colorado and academic freedom. A University
panel recently determined that Churchill plagiarized and fabricated material
in his scholarship and recommended his dismissal. Colorado Governor Bill
Owens has called for his resignation.

Listen/Watch/Read
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/27/146255


* Headlines for September 27, 2006 *

- NIE: Iraq War Has Become the 'Cause Celebre' for Jihadists
- Democrats Decide Not to Filibuster Detainee Bill
- 31 Ex-Ambassadors Warn Against Eliminating Habeas Corpus
- State Dept Poll: 75% of Baghdad Residents Want U.S. Out
- Lincoln Group Gets New Iraq Contract
- 71 Arrested At Anti-War Protest in Washington
- UN Official: Israel Has Turned Gaza Into A ³Prison²
- UN: One Million Cluster Bomblets Remain Unexploded in Lebanon
- Bush Blocks Study of Hurricane-Global Warming Link
- Scientists: Earth¹s Temperature Climbs to Record Levels
- Desmond Tutu Warns South Africa Is Losing Its Moral Direction

Listen/Watch/Read
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/27/146236

AWOL Soldier Agustin Aguayo Turns Himself In

Democracy Now! 9/27/06

AWOL Soldier Agustin Aguayo Turns Himself In
And finally in an update from a story Democracy Now! covered yesterday, Army medic Agustin Aguayo turned himself in on Tuesday at Fort Irwin in California. He had refused to return to Iraq and went AWOL. Aguayo held a news conference before he turned himself in.

Agustin Aguayo: "Why am I turning myself in? Because it is the right thing to do. It is the responsible thing to do. I'm not a deserter or a coward. I just felt that I needed to be unavailable for this movement because I have come to believe that it is so wrong."

============================================================

two articles -

(1) AP story on Agustin Aguayo, confirming that he
turned himself in to Fort Irwin this afternoon, after a news
conference at an LA church.

http://news.google.com/news/url?sa=t&ct=us/9-0&fp=45195a2c2686e585&ei=w9sZRfrSD6SCHNmDqfIJ&url=http%3A//www.contracostatimes.com/mld/cctimes/news/15615487.htm&cid=0

And

(2) Stars & Stripes:

http://www.estripes.com/article.asp?section=104&article=40349

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

take action - No Discretion to the President to Torture

http://staceyforcongress.com/petitions/pnum518.php

Sir! No Sir!

Monday, September 25, 2006

Alliance for Justice - TAKE ACTION: Defend the Constitution

The Issue

TAKE ACTION: Defend the Constitution
Justice System Under Attack
In the wake of a Supreme Court ruling that the Bush Administration broke the law by holding people in prison without revealing the charges against them, Congress is now considering legislation that would legalize such tactics.


The Military Commissions Act of 2006 would allow suspects to be imprisoned by the military with no right to hear the charges against them in a federal court.



What's at Stake


If passed, this legislation will undermine the greatest principles of our system of justice – the right of suspects to know why they are being imprisoned, and the assumption that a person is innocent until proven guilty.

NO TIME TO LOSE: Congress will act on this legislation this week -- the time for action is now.



What You Can Do


Urge your Senators and House members to support an amendment to the Military Commissions Act that protects all of our rights, by preserving the rights of the accused to know what crimes they are being charged with.

Click here to send a letter to your elected representatives.



Learn More


To read the letter Alliance for Justice sent to Senate leaders, click here.

To read the New York Times articles about this legislation, click on the links below (login required):

Detainee Deal Comes with Contradictions (September 23, 2006)

Measures Seek to Restrict Detainees' Access to Courts (September 21, 2006)





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Visit the web address below to tell your friends about this.
Tell-a-friend!



If you received this message from a friend, you can sign up for Alliance for Justice.


This message was sent to abeltranjurisdr@aol.com. Visit your subscription management page to modify your email communication preferences or update your personal profile. To stop receiving Justice Action Network, click to unsubscribe. To stop ALL email from Alliance for Justice, click to remove yourself from our lists (or reply via email with "remove or unsubscribe" in the subject line).

Fwd: Harsh Immigration and Criminal Justice Bills Before Congress

Fwd: ACLU ONLINE SPECIAL ALERT: Congress to Vote on Spying, Detainee Rules

Harsh Immigration and Criminal Justice Bills Before Congress

In this final week before members of Congress leave Washington to campaign for mid-term elections, Republicans are looking to score political points by pushing through harsh crime and anti-immigrant measures that undermine due process and flout the very freedoms America represents.

Just last week, the House of Representatives passed a package of "get tough" anti-immigrant measures that would, among other things: broaden the constitutionally dubious practice of indefinite detention; expand the unjust practice of expedited removal—deportation without a lawyer, hearing, or court review; authorize state and local police to enforce federal immigration laws; and make it more difficult to sue the government for violating immigrants' rights. The Senate could vote on these measures this week.

In addition to the anti-immigration legislation, there is an effort to pass several harsh criminal justice bills. This package of Judiciary Committee legislation would include new federal death penalties, mandatory minimum sentences and further restrictions on federal habeas corpus proceedings.

It is quite possible that Republican leaders will attempt to attach any or all of these bills to the must-pass Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill—daring Democrats to vote against it. But lawmakers should not undermine our civil rights and civil liberties as an election-year strategy.

Please call your members of Congress today and urge them to pass a "clean" DHS appropriations bill and oppose any attempts to attach legislation that would undermine our fundamental freedoms.

take action now! - Stop Torture! & Let your Senators hear pro-immigrant voices!

Fwd - two from National Immigrant Solidarity Network

----------------------------------

9/25: The Immigrant Battle Shifts to the Senate – More Calls Needed!!!!!

Urgent Alerts from National Immigrant Solidarity Network
http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org


Dear immigrant activists:

The coming week will be the critical moment for the immigrant struggles, despite
the opposition from the immigrant activists, the U.S. House last week passed
several outrageous racist anti-immigrant bills:
H.R. 6061 - Border Fence Bill
H.R. 4844 - Federal Election Integrity Act of 2006 ("Voter ID bill")
H.R. 6089 - Illegal Immigrant Deterrence Act
H.R. 6090 - Immigration Enforcement Act
H.R. 6091 - Border Security Enhancement Act

The next struggles will be at the Senate, we need to spare no time to non-stop
calling the Senate:

- Tell your Senator that he or she should not allow enforcement-only legislation
to be attached to spending bills.

- Also tell your Senator that the enforcement-only approach taken by the House
will only make matters worse, and that only comprehensive immigration reform
will fix our broken immigration system.

- Tell your Senator to vote no on the Fence bill, H.R. 6061.

The following Senators are key, as they are on the Homeland Security
Subcommittee of the Appropriations Committee:

Senator Judd Gregg (Chairman) (NH)
Senator Thad Cochran (MS)
Senator Ted Stevens (AK)
Senator Arlen Specter (PA)
Senator Pete Domenici (NM)
Senator Richard Shelby (AL)
Senator Larry Craig (ID)
Senator Robert Bennett (UT)
Senator Wayne Allard (CO)
Senator Robert C. Byrd (Ranking Member) (WV)
Senator Daniel Inouye (HI)
Senator Patrick Leahy (VT)
Senator Barbara Mikulski (MD)
Senator Herb Kohl (WI)
Senator Patty Murray (WA)
Senator Harry Reid (NV)
Senator Dianne Feinstein (CA)

You can find contact information for all Senators here:
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

Please tell us what happened by send us a copy of your messages to:
info@ImmigrantSolidarity.org



Please read the following excellent analysis from the National Immigration
Forum:


The Battle Shifts to the Senate – More Calls Needed
National Immigration Forum
September 21, 2006

With the House having passed their anti-immigrant legislation, it is now up to
the Senate (where there is not as much of the panic about the low regard of the
public for Congress that is driving the House to spend so much time creating
fear of immigrants) to stop enforcement-only legislation from passing. Still,
it will take an intense battle to stop the House effort to ram through
enforcement-only legislation at the end of the session.

The good news is that at least in some offices we have heard that Senators are
hearing from pro-immigrant voices, and there have been positive signs from some
Senators that the Senate will not go along with what the House has done.

For example, Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), a key player because he is Chair of
the Judiciary Committee as well as a member of the Homeland Security
Subcommittee of the Appropriations Committee, told reporters today that House
Republicans would have no incentive to work out differences with the Senate on a
comprehensive immigration overhaul if senators go along with the piecemeal
approach of the House. "We have to take care of a guest worker program, we have
to take care of employer verification, we have to take care of 11 million
undocumented workers," Specter said.

Other Senators who have made positive comments expressing concern about what the
House has done, or about the need to reform the immigration laws in a
comprehensive manner, include Senators Larry Craig (R-ID) and Dianne Feinstein
(D-CA).

House Measures May be Attached to Spending Bills

The fence bill may pass when it is considered on Monday. The more worrisome
scenario is that the state and local enforcement and anti-due process bills will
be attached to bills allocating money for the Department of Homeland Security
(or possibly for Defense). Once that is done, it becomes extremely difficult to
stop, because that requires Senators to vote against funding for the entire
Department of Homeland Security—a politically difficult move.

The object, then, is to prevent the House measures from being attached to the
Spending bills in the first place. That will take calls to your Senators and to
Senate appropriators.

Continue your calls to Senate offices!!!!!

§ Tell your Senator that he or she should not allow enforcement-only
legislation to be attached to spending bills.
§ Also tell your Senator that the enforcement-only approach taken by the
House will only make matters worse, and that only comprehensive immigration
reform will fix our broken immigration system.
§ Tell your Senator to vote no on the Fence bill, H.R. 6061.

The following Senators are key, as they are on the Homeland Security
Subcommittee of the Appropriations Committee:

Senator Judd Gregg (Chairman) (NH)
Senator Thad Cochran (MS)
Senator Ted Stevens (AK)
Senator Arlen Specter (PA)
Senator Pete Domenici (NM)
Senator Richard Shelby (AL)
Senator Larry Craig (ID)
Senator Robert Bennett (UT)
Senator Wayne Allard (CO)
Senator Robert C. Byrd (Ranking Member) (WV)
Senator Daniel Inouye (HI)
Senator Patrick Leahy (VT)
Senator Barbara Mikulski (MD)
Senator Herb Kohl (WI)
Senator Patty Murray (WA)
Senator Harry Reid (NV)
Senator Dianne Feinstein (CA)

You can find contact information for all Senators here:
http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

You can also check out this action alert from the American Immigration Lawyers
Association:
http://capwiz.com/aila2/issues/alert/?alertid=9036716&type=CO

More on what can be done, from AILA:
http://www.aila.org/content/default.aspx?docid=20623

If you can make additional calls other that to the offices of your Senators,
call the Senators on the Appropriations Committee listed above. It would be
good especially to thank Senators Specter, Feinstein, and Craig, for their
comments in the press supportive of a comprehensive approach.

House Passes Anti-Immigrant Legislation

This afternoon, the House passed two enforcement bills that would, among other
things, allow state and local police to enforce civil immigration laws and would
shield the government from accountability for misdeeds or misapplication of
immigration law towards certain immigrants. Since these bills were taken from
the Sensenbrenner bill, H.R. 4437, which passed the House last December, it was
not a surprise that the House voted for these measures again.

Click on the links below to see how your member voted
§ Community Protection Act
§ Immigration Law Enforcement Act

With no provision for increasing legal channels for immigration, and having
passed a bill to construct fencing on the U.S./Mexican border, House leaders
figured they would need an anti-tunneling bill. That bill, the Border Tunnel
Prevention Act, also passed, by a k.house.gov/evs/2006/roll469.xml
onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)" href="http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll469.xml"
target=_blank rel=nofollowvote of 422 to nothing.

Background Information About
H.R. 4844, H.R. 6089, H.R. 6090 H.R. 6091

9/21: AAJC DENOUCES PASSAGE OF MORE ANTI-IMMIGRANT LEGISLATIONS BY THE HOUSE OF
REPRESENTATIVES
9/21: Republicans Reach Deal on Detainee Bill
By Sheryl Gay Stolberg - New York Times
9/18: Congress Aims to Require Voter ID H.R. 4844
9/19: Analysis of H.R. 6089, H.R. 6090 and H.R. 6091
Immigrant Legal Resource Center
9/14: Immigration Policy Update
National Immigration Forum
9/14: CLEAR Act on House agenda; information and ideas
National Immigration Forum
9/15: URGENT: Stop U.S. Authorization of Indefinite Detention
Center for Constitutional Rights


===========================================================

9/25: Silence in a Time of Torture is Complicity

From: World Can't Wait

We have now come to a defining moment, where before the world's eyes the U.S.
Congress is poised to legalize torture. We reject such a course outright. It
does not represent us.

We remember the images from Abu Ghraib prison -- photos of depravity, even
death. And what of the images we have never been shown from a world of even more
disturbing and more "professional" horrors that have been concealed in secret
prisons around the world?

To anyone of conscience, this is unacceptable. But this is exactly what your
government will be making legitimate. With bi-partisan support, the "Military
Commissions Act of 2006" will be made law unless people act to stop it.

Sold as a "compromise," this bill is fundamentally worse than what has gone
before.

The bill takes what has existed in the shadowy world of clandestine action and
now gives it the openly declared mantle of official, legal approval. While the
compromise is being sold as complying with the Geneva Conventions, it gives the
President huge freedom to, by executive order, define "special methods" of
interrogation that HE feels "fit" that Convention. It removes the right of
anyone to raise the Geneva Conventions in federal court to challenge government
action against them.

The compromise allows the government the power to use confessions and other
testimony derived from torture as evidence in criminal proceedings. The
compromise officially, and legally, puts Congress on record approving that the
president may, at his own discretion, declare anyone an "enemy combatant." This
means the president can name anyone anywhere as such and remove them from the
reach of family or legal counsel and hold them indefinitely without trial. It
ends the Constitutional right of habeas corpus.

All this is now to be done openly, and in our name. All these actions -- and the
Bush Regime which has commissioned war crimes -- must be brought to a halt. What
is being met with silence in the halls of power must be manifested as a real
opposition in the streets. At stake here is what kind of country and what kind
of people we choose to be.
Let it not be said that the people did nothing when their government moved to
make torture lawful. Let the world know that the people of this country did not
acquiesce, but instead stood up and said

"TORTURE DOES NOT REPRESENT US!
THIS REGIME DOES NOT REPRESENT US!
WE WILL DRIVE IT OUT!"

**************************************

Send this message with your comments to comments@whitehouse.gov
with a cc: to notorture@worldcantwait.org
and contact key members of the Senate Armed Forces Committee:

Sen. John Warner (Chairman), VA , Phone: (202) 224-2023 Fax: (202) 224-6295
Sen. John McCain, AZ, Phone: (202) 224-2235 Fax: (202) 228-2862
Sen. Carl Levin, MI, Phone: (202) 224-6221 Fax: (202) 224-1388
Sen. Susan Collins, ME, Phone: (202) 224-2523 Fax: (202) 224-2693
Sen. Edward Kennedy, MA, Phone: (202) 224-4543 Fax: (202) 224-2417
Sen. Lindsey Graham, SC, Phone: (202) 224-5972 Fax: (202) 224-3808
Sen. Robert Byrd, WV, Phone: (202) 224-3954 Fax: (202) 228-0002
Sen. Hillary Clinton, NY, Phone: (202) 224-4451 Fax: (202) 228-0282

Send this letter to all your friends and have them send it to their friends.
Tell them THIS MUST NOT PASS and that you are pledging to be in the streets on
October 5 because The World Can’t Wait. Drive Out the Bush Regime!

In the next week we intend to send over 50 thousand of your responses to
President Bush and the Congress. Send a copy of your messages to
notorture@worldcantwait.org

Excellent opinion pieces against torture:

Ariel Dorfman in the Washington Post Sunday 9-24-06

Molly Ivins in TruthDig.com

=================================================================

[the above two, courtesy:]

National Immigrant Solidarity Network
No Immigrant Bashing! Support Immigrant Rights!
webpage: http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org
e-mail: info@ImmigrantSolidarity.org
New York: (212)330-8172
Los Angeles: (213)403-0131
Washington D.C.: (202)595-8990

==================================================

Fwd - courtesy another peace and justice concerned person:

1. Humane Treatment Standard Maintained, But Serious Concerns Remain
HRF Analysis of Compromise on Detainee Interrogation and Prosecution
Press Release
09/22/06 - Updated

2. 'Different spanks for different ranks': reject the compromise or pardon the
Abu Ghraib offenders


http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/hotline/2006/09/different-spanks-for-different-ranks.php



Friday, September 22, 2006

'Different spanks for different ranks': reject the compromise or pardon the Abu
Ghraib offenders
12:45 PM ET

Ben Davis [University of Toledo College of Law]: "There's an old adage in the
military entitled "different spanks for different ranks" (see James W. Smith
III, "A Few Good Scapegoats: The Abu Ghraib Courts-Martial and the Failure of
the Military Justice System", 27 Whittier Law Review 671, 677, 693 (2006)):
persons at lower levels in the military receive more severe punishment then
those at higher levels.

The classic case of this is the Abu Ghraib scandal in which no general or high
level civilian authority was court-martialed and Brigadier General Karpinski was

given nonjudicial punishment that was specifically said to not relate to the
prisoner abuse.

Army Reserve Specialist Charles Graner, Staff Sgt. Ivan Frederick II, Spc.
Jeremy Sivits, Spc. Megan Ambuhl, and Army Reserve Pfc Lynndie England were all
court-martialed. They should all be seeking review and a Presidential pardon if
the compromise detainee bill is made law.

Under the compromise detainee bill, nothing in any of those infamous Abu Ghraib
pictures that shocked the world would be prohibited. The basic rule of the
compromise detainee bill is "don't kill or rape them". With the assistance of
creative Office of Legal Counsel lawyers that brought us this bill we can expect

definitions of "severe" and "serious" and "cruel, inhuman and degrading" to
allow the dogs and everything else.

As part of the Program, we can expect the President (in the role of the sole
arbiter of Geneva Conventions compliance as foreseen in the bill) to feel
comfortable that no technique short of death or rape "shocks the conscience"
(the implicit residual standard).

The offenders at Abu Ghraib were held to a different standard - the Uniform Code

of Military Justice which embodies the Geneva Conventions.

If they did what they were asked to do and Congress now says that we can
continue the Program (which appears much worse then what the Abu Ghraib
offenders did) then it seems extremely unfair for the Abu Ghraib offenders to be

languishing in prison if this is the legislation.

At a minimum, the President should pardon all of them so that we do not appear
to be hypocritical. After all, it has been made clear that the torture that has
been going on will be allowed to continue as part of "the Program." It is
patently clear that our domestic law as proposed by this compromise and as
expected to be practiced will be in breach of the United States obligations
under Common Article 3.

Now, if, as we all felt, there remains some revulsion about the Abu Ghraib
pictures then it seems to me that whether those acts are done by soldiers or
intelligence persons we should object - they are torture no matter what the
euphemisms proposed and are "outrages against human dignity". And to make that
objection clear we should reject this detainee bill compromise. That is, if we
still have consciences that can be shocked.

This does not mean we have any sympathy for the detainees like Khalid Sheik
Muhammad. But, what disturbs me is that the manner in which this bill is going
forward reminds me of how lynch mobs work - they would torture the person before

they burned him. A structure is being put in place that embraces the kind of
unlawful command influence that caused dysfunctional proceedings in World War
II. We had a Vanderbilt Commission which examined those proceedings and that
work led to the kinds of adjustments to military law and military commission law

embodied in the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

A further concern is that the lesson of this is to (1) select lawyers to make
fanciful interpretations of the law, (2) as President sign off on orders that
are made pursuant to those fanciful interpretations, (3) have members of the
military and intelligence community compromise themselves by working under those

fanciful interpretations, (4) when it all explodes, prosecute a few of the low
level military under tough UCMJ standards and one civilian contractor
(Passarro), (5) for the core employees press Congress to amend the law for
"clarity" to protect them (6) and then push Congress to "not look weak" by
enshrining in law the procedures based on the original fanciful interpretations.

Please note, in the context of international law, this type of process is
precisely why the rule has developed that a state can not avail itself of its
internal law to extract itself from its international obligations. Thus, those
amateurs of U.S. foreign relations law who may succeed through this compromise
in immunizing themselves from domestic court proceedings (and the language as
presented does not prevent federal conspiracy or state charges) will not have
absolved themselves of individual responsibility as a matter of international
criminal law.

Clearly, these actors in the Executive and Legislative are willing to take that
risk.

One possible glimmer is whether Congress delegation of authority to the
President here will be considered too broad. But that would require a challenge
in the courts, and that will take some time. In the meantime, the Program would
continue.

So reject this compromise or be consistent with the compromise language and
pardon the Abu Ghraib offenders. In other words, demonstrate what we think
America stands for. After all, now we have the pictures. I hope we would reject
the compromise - that's what America is to me."

Subscribing:
To subscribe to the list, send mail to lawofcolor@lists.riseup.net.

Unsubscribing:
To unsubscribe from the list, send mail to lawofcolor-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net,
where listname is the name of the list. Alternately, you can login, click 'Your
Subscriptions', click on the name of the list, then click 'Unsubscribe'.

Anti-Torture Teaching Resource

Anti-Torture Teaching Resource

Subject: Anti-Torture Teaching Resource From: "Clarity Press, Inc." Date: 20 Sep 2006


If President George W. Bush has his way,
torture will become the norm
in America's war on terror.
CAN WE LET TORTURE BECOME
THE AMERICAN WAY?


THE PEAR TREE: Is Torture Ever Justified?


by Eric Stener Carlson

Foreword by Richard Pierre Claude
Founding Editor, Human Rights Quarterly

Late one night, Eric Stener Carlson sat down to review witness statements of torture victims splayed across his desk. And so this book began...

It takes us on a journey from the mass graves of Argentina, to the desolate slums of Peru, to the brutality of the Dominican Republic and the rape camps of the former Yugoslavia. Carlson probes the rationale for torture on the personal level of the spectator who, in the grip of fear, might presume to be safeguarded thereby. The Pear Tree is a stark exposition of torturers and victims, and the witnesses who choose to support one side or the other. It addresses the experiential, philosophical and political dimensions of the question: Can we safeguard our children by torturing the children of others?





"This small book should be read by everyone today, when the subject is in the forefront of the national consciousness. No one should make up their mind about torture before they read this book."

Herbert F. Spirer,
Professor Emeritus
University of Connecticut
former Adjunct Professor of International Affairs
Columbia University


"This is a unique work of spiritual exorcism that both exposes the errors of excuses offered for torture while allowing us to see those who harm us as human. Moreover, it is a work of narrative philosophy that is purgative in intent and a work of high literary merit that is ultimately healing in effect."

from the Foreword by
Richard Pierre Claude


"[Carlson's] exploration aims to shrink the distance between him and the atrocities he studies, to defend against the numbness of the professional observer. In vividly told stories, Carlson struggles honestly not only to empathize with the victim, but to put himself, too, in the place of the perpetrator. By doing so, he both acknowledges the instinct to protect that could make him kill or torture and affirms the reasons why he cannot."

James J. Silk
Executive Director
Orville H. Schell Jr. Center for International Human Rights
Yale Law School



ABOUT ERIC STENER CARLSON
Eric Stener Carlson is a recognized expert in human rights and the study of torture, with many years experience working for international organizations. He has investigated mass sexual assault for the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia, exhumed and identified bodies of "the disappeared" in Argentina as a Fulbright scholar, and assessed prison conditions of alleged terrorists throughout Peru as a free-lance expert. His publications include I Remember Julia: Voices of the Disappeared, and articles in The Lancet, and The British Journal of Criminology. Carlson holds a Ph.D. in Political Science from the University of California at Santa Barbara, and an M.A. in International Affairs from Columbia University.



CLARITY PRESS, INC. http://www.claritypress.com

ISBN: 0-932863-45-0 Paper $14.95 2006


Table of contents, synopsis and reviews available at:

http://www.bookmasters.com/clarity/b0026.htm


Available from:

SCB Distributors,15608 South New Century Drive, Gardena, CA. 90248

victor@scbdistributors.com
Toll-free 800-729-6423
* Tel: 1-310-532-9400
* Fax: 1-310-532-7001

or through www.amazon.com or Ingram

or Fernwood Books in Canada. Lindsay@fernwoodbooks.ca

To remove: clarity@islandnet.com

Sunday, September 24, 2006

'Different spanks for different ranks': reject the compromise or pardon the Abu Ghraib offenders

'Different spanks for different ranks': reject the compromise or pardon the
Abu Ghraib offenders


http://jurist.law.pitt.edu/hotline/2006/09/different-spanks-for-different-ranks.php


Friday, September 22, 2006

'Different spanks for different ranks': reject the compromise or pardon the Abu
Ghraib offenders
12:45 PM ET

Ben Davis [University of Toledo College of Law]: "There's an old adage in the
military entitled "different spanks for different ranks" (see James W. Smith
III, "A Few Good Scapegoats: The Abu Ghraib Courts-Martial and the Failure of
the Military Justice System", 27 Whittier Law Review 671, 677, 693 (2006)):
persons at lower levels in the military receive more severe punishment then
those at higher levels.

The classic case of this is the Abu Ghraib scandal in which no general or high
level civilian authority was court-martialed and Brigadier General Karpinski was
given nonjudicial punishment that was specifically said to not relate to the
prisoner abuse.

Army Reserve Specialist Charles Graner, Staff Sgt. Ivan Frederick II, Spc.
Jeremy Sivits, Spc. Megan Ambuhl, and Army Reserve Pfc Lynndie England were all
court-martialed. They should all be seeking review and a Presidential pardon if
the compromise detainee bill is made law.

Under the compromise detainee bill, nothing in any of those infamous Abu Ghraib
pictures that shocked the world would be prohibited. The basic rule of the
compromise detainee bill is "don't kill or rape them". With the assistance of
creative Office of Legal Counsel lawyers that brought us this bill we can expect
definitions of "severe" and "serious" and "cruel, inhuman and degrading" to
allow the dogs and everything else.

As part of the Program, we can expect the President (in the role of the sole
arbiter of Geneva Conventions compliance as foreseen in the bill) to feel
comfortable that no technique short of death or rape "shocks the conscience"
(the implicit residual standard).

The offenders at Abu Ghraib were held to a different standard - the Uniform Code
of Military Justice which embodies the Geneva Conventions.

If they did what they were asked to do and Congress now says that we can
continue the Program (which appears much worse then what the Abu Ghraib
offenders did) then it seems extremely unfair for the Abu Ghraib offenders to be
languishing in prison if this is the legislation.

At a minimum, the President should pardon all of them so that we do not appear
to be hypocritical. After all, it has been made clear that the torture that has
been going on will be allowed to continue as part of "the Program." It is
patently clear that our domestic law as proposed by this compromise and as
expected to be practiced will be in breach of the United States obligations
under Common Article 3.

Now, if, as we all felt, there remains some revulsion about the Abu Ghraib
pictures then it seems to me that whether those acts are done by soldiers or
intelligence persons we should object - they are torture no matter what the
euphemisms proposed and are "outrages against human dignity". And to make that
objection clear we should reject this detainee bill compromise. That is, if we
still have consciences that can be shocked.

This does not mean we have any sympathy for the detainees like Khalid Sheik
Muhammad. But, what disturbs me is that the manner in which this bill is going
forward reminds me of how lynch mobs work - they would torture the person before
they burned him. A structure is being put in place that embraces the kind of
unlawful command influence that caused dysfunctional proceedings in World War
II. We had a Vanderbilt Commission which examined those proceedings and that
work led to the kinds of adjustments to military law and military commission law
embodied in the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

A further concern is that the lesson of this is to (1) select lawyers to make
fanciful interpretations of the law, (2) as President sign off on orders that
are made pursuant to those fanciful interpretations, (3) have members of the
military and intelligence community compromise themselves by working under those
fanciful interpretations, (4) when it all explodes, prosecute a few of the low
level military under tough UCMJ standards and one civilian contractor
(Passarro), (5) for the core employees press Congress to amend the law for
"clarity" to protect them (6) and then push Congress to "not look weak" by
enshrining in law the procedures based on the original fanciful interpretations.

Please note, in the context of international law, this type of process is
precisely why the rule has developed that a state can not avail itself of its
internal law to extract itself from its international obligations. Thus, those
amateurs of U.S. foreign relations law who may succeed through this compromise
in immunizing themselves from domestic court proceedings (and the language as
presented does not prevent federal conspiracy or state charges) will not have
absolved themselves of individual responsibility as a matter of international
criminal law.

Clearly, these actors in the Executive and Legislative are willing to take that
risk.

One possible glimmer is whether Congress delegation of authority to the
President here will be considered too broad. But that would require a challenge
in the courts, and that will take some time. In the meantime, the Program would
continue.

So reject this compromise or be consistent with the compromise language and
pardon the Abu Ghraib offenders. In other words, demonstrate what we think
America stands for. After all, now we have the pictures. I hope we would reject
the compromise - that's what America is to me."

Nationwide Actions 'Declare Peace', Raise Pressure on Congress

Nationwide Actions 'Declare Peace', Raise Pressure on Congress

http://www.commondreams.org/headlines06/0923-01.htm


===============

Printer Friendly Version E-Mail This Article
Published on Saturday, September 23, 2006 by OneWorld.net
Nationwide Actions 'Declare Peace', Raise Pressure on Congress
by Haider Rizvi

NEW YORK - A nationwide civil disobedience campaign aiming to force the administration of President George W. Bush and the U.S. Congress to end the military occupation of Iraq is now in full swing.


Anti-war demonstrators block a gate to the White House in Washington, Thursday, Sept. 21, 2006, after marching in front of the White House protesting the war in Iraq. Park police officers arrested 34 of the demonstrators after they refused to leave. (AP Photo/Ron Edmonds)

More than 500 peace groups and justice organizations from all over the United States have joined the "Declaration of Peace," a week-long comprehensive campaign that calls for a prompt timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

Those who signed the Declaration this week pledged to hold demonstrations, rallies, marches, and vigils in hundreds of cities across the country, which will continue until next Thursday.

The protests have started at a time when the campaign for upcoming Congressional elections is getting into top gear and many lawmakers are preparing to go back to their home states for six weeks of intense campaigning.

On Thursday, police in Washington, DC arrested more than 30 activists who tried to deliver copies of the Declaration to the Bush administration as part of their pledge to get involved in actions of civil disobedience.

Prominent among those arrested in front of the White House include Father Joseph Nangle, co-director of Franciscan Missions, James Winkler, general secretary of the United Methodist Church, and Leslie Cagan, national coordinator of the United for Peace and Justice activist group.

"The breath and depth of the actions taking place this week are a testament to the growing sentiment of the people of this country against the occupation of Iraq," said Cagan in a statement before her arrest.

"As citizens and people of faith, we must be our country's conscience," added Reverend Lennox Yearwood of the Hip Hop Caucus, who was also arrested for taking part in the White House action.

Like Yearwood, scores of church leaders who have joined the anti-war campaign believe that their actions will give the government "the moral courage to set a firm deadline to end the occupation of Iraq."

Activists say they have organized more than 350 actions of civil disobedience in all parts of the country, including in unlikely places such as Lincoln, Nebraska; Fayetteville, North Carolina; Houston, Texas; Des Moines, Iowa; Little Rock, Arkansas; and Cincinnati, Ohio.

Though the campaign is heavily dominated by faith-based groups, many lawmakers, former military leaders, and veterans are also taking an active part in the protests.

"I have seen with my own eyes the human cost of this occupation," said Kelly Dougherty, cofounder of Iraq Veterans against the War. "It is my duty to my fellow soldiers to end the escalation of violence."

Though Democratic Party officials have made no call for participation in the demonstration, this week some lawmakers publicly endorsed the Declaration. They include Rep. Earl Blumenauer (OR), Danny Davis (IL), Sam Farr (CA), Chaka Fattah (PA), Barbara Lee (CA), John Lewis (GA), Jan Schakowsky (IL), and Lynn Woolsey (CA).

"As a participant in the civil rights movement, I have confronted violence with nonviolence. I have been arrested over 40 times. I have been beaten and left bloody in the streets to die," said Lewis after signing the Declaration.

"And what I came to realize is that our strongest weapons as a nation are not bombs and missiles," he added. "Our strongest defense is the power of our ideas. It is what we believe about democracy and respect for human dignity."

In addition to a prompt timetable for withdrawal of troops, the Declaration calls for "closure of bases; a peace process for security, reconstruction, and reconciliation; and a shift of funding for war to meeting human needs."

Signers of the Declaration said if their demands were not met by the administration and the Congress they would organize another round of civil disobedience actions beyond September.

Despite protests and growing criticism of the war, the Bush administration seems to be in no mood to set a deadline for troop withdrawal. Last week, the House of Representatives passed a motion backing the president's handling of the war and rejecting a deadline for recalling U.S. forces.

With the Senate having already rejected the troop withdrawal plan, the House motion was passed 256-153 on a party line vote.

Since the occupation of Iraq started in March 2003, more than 100,000 Iraqis have died as a direct or indirect result of the U.S. military action and the subsequent suicidal attacks carried out by the forces of resistance, according to a team of independent researchers and academics.

The war has cost the United States billions of dollars and more than 2,500 human lives.

© 2006 OneWorld.net

###

NYC **9/29 FRI, 7 pm - Film/benefit: "Who's Afraid of Lynne Stewart?"

**9/29 FRI, 7 pm - Film/benefit: excerpts from documentary by
Flavia Fontes, "Who's Afraid of Lynne Stewart?" W/introductions
by Michael Ratner (Center for Constitutional Rights) & atty
Michael Smith. At DC TV, Lafayette St below Canal St. Donations
accepted, for documentary production costs. Reserve:
212-625-9696. Info: http://www.lynnestewart.org/

Filmmaking Pushes Limits Of US-Cuba Embargo

Filmmaking Pushes Limits Of US-Cuba Embargo

Filmmaking Pushes Limits Of US-Cuba Embargo
(CBS4 News) COCONUT GROVE Maneuvering the fine dance between politics and art when making films in Cuba can prove difficult and oftentimes impossible. Yet, one Cuban-American filmmaker from Los Angeles has performed this dance impeccably by pushing the limits of what independent filmmaking can accomplish and what the US government will allow, with the film "Love and Suicide".

Produced by actor and writer Luis Moro, the film was first shown at the American Black Film Festival in Miami Beach this July.

Shot in Havana, the movie is the story of Tomas, a New Yorker played by Kamar De Los Reyes, who goes to Cuba to commit suicide. Along the way he meets Moro’s character, Alberto, a Cuban taxi cab driver who helps bridge a cultural gap between Tomas and his past.

The handsome De Los Reyes, who you might recognize from some daytime soap operas, also finds love along the way, when he meets American tourist Nina, played by Daisy McCrackin.

Together with Nina and Alberto, Tomas finds his Cuban identity, as he savors the island's culture. Moro and director Lisa France managed to capture the spellbinding charm of the poor, yet spirited island of Cuba in their film. With shots of the Malecon, old Havana, the Morro Castle, the movie is sure to inspire nostalgia among the old and spark the interest of younger generations in the island, the same way it did with the main character.

Moro’s film is now showing in Miami, but that doesn’t mean he's getting away without facing the US government scrutiny. Days after it was screened at the American Black Film Festival, the US Treasury Department notified Moro that his trip to Cuba was being investigated.

Until 2004, US Law allowed Cuban-Americans such as Moro to visit the island without a special permit, as long as they were visiting family, but visits for filmmaking were not included.

Luis, would like to see the US embargo lifted thinks the whole situation is absurd.

"But films go under freedom of speech, so we decided to go make a movie, and we did," said Moro.

Moro and France shot the movie in 2003 while attending a movie festival in Havana, using a small digital video camera, wireless microphones and handful of production crew. They thought they had escaped harassment from both governments.

"We never got any permission from the government that's all I could say," he said. "How we did it, that's our trade secret."

The film had only been showing at the AMC Theaters in CocoWalk, but is now being shown in the following theaters: AMC Theaters Aventura, Kendall Town and Country and Mall of the Americas.

For updated information on theaters and times check local listings or log onto: www.everythingcuba.com.

Daniel Lastra

(© MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Friday, September 22, 2006

House Passes Immigration Enforcement Bills -- Call Your Senators to Prevent Further Action!

House Passes Immigration Enforcement Bills -- Call Your Senators to Prevent Further Action!

from anonymous source:

MOST importantly, our Senators need to hear that:


* Immigration reform is too important to rush through in the
waning days of the session without full debate and deliberation;
* We want our Senators to OPPOSE not only any stand-alone
"enforcement only" immigration bills proposed in the final weeks of the
session, but also to OPPOSE efforts to ATTACH immigration bills to
"must-pass" appropriations bills. They should oppose any attempt at an
end-run around the Senate's bipartisan and more balanced immigration
reforms passed earlier in the year (S. 2611).

Stealing America: Will the Next Election Be Hacked?

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092106R.shtml

Robert F. Kennedy Jr.:
Will the Next Election
Be Hacked?

Rolling Stone
Thursday 05 October 2006 Issue
Fresh disasters at the polls - and new evidence from an industry insider - prove that electronic voting machines can't be trusted.

Read Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s "Was the 2004 Election Stolen?" in the June 15th, 2006, issue of "Rolling Stone," his investigation into how Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted - enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.
The debacle of the 2000 presidential election made it all too apparent to most Americans that our electoral system is broken. And private-sector entrepreneurs were quick to offer a fix: Touch-screen voting machines, promised the industry and its lobbyists, would make voting as easy and reliable as withdrawing cash from an ATM. Congress, always ready with funds for needy industries, swiftly authorized $3.9 billion to upgrade the nation's election systems - with much of the money devoted to installing electronic voting machines in each of America's 180,000 precincts. But as midterm elections approach this November, electronic voting machines are making things worse instead of better. Studies have demonstrated that hackers can easily rig the technology to fix an election - and across the country this year, faulty equipment and lax security have repeatedly undermined election primaries. In Tarrant County, Texas, electronic machines counted some ballots as many as six times, recording 100,000 more votes than were actually cast. In San Diego, poll workers took machines home for unsupervised "sleepovers" before the vote, leaving the equipment vulnerable to tampering. And in Ohio - where, as I recently reported in "Was the 2004 Election Stolen?" [RS 1002], dirty tricks may have cost John Kerry the presidency - a government report uncovered large and unexplained discrepancies in vote totals recorded by machines in Cuyahoga County.

Even worse, many electronic machines don't produce a paper record that can be recounted when equipment malfunctions - an omission that practically invites malicious tampering. "Every board of election has staff members with the technological ability to fix an election," Ion Sancho, an election supervisor in Leon County, Florida, told me. "Even one corrupt staffer can throw an election. Without paper records, it could happen under my nose and there is no way I'd ever find out about it. With a few key people in the right places, it would be possible to throw a presidential election ..."

to continue reading click here - http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092106R.shtml

============================================

Stealing America: The Film that Busts the Fraud

http://www.gregpalast.com/stealing-america-the-film-that-bust-the-fraud

Air Force chief: Test weapons on testy U.S. mobs

http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/09/12/usaf.weapons.ap/index.html


Air Force chief: Test weapons on testy U.S. mobs


POSTED: 7:56 p.m. EDT, September 12, 2006


*WASHINGTON* (AP) -- Nonlethal weapons such as high-power microwave
devices should be used on American citizens in crowd-control situations
before being used on the battlefield, the Air Force secretary said Tuesday.

The object is basically public relations. Domestic use would make it
easier to avoid questions from others about possible safety
considerations, said Secretary Michael Wynne.

"If we're not willing to use it here against our fellow citizens, then
we should not be willing to use it in a wartime situation," said Wynne.
"(Because) if I hit somebody with a nonlethal weapon and they claim that
it injured them in a way that was not intended, I think that I would be
vilified in the world press."

The Air Force has paid for research into nonlethal weapons, but he said
the service is unlikely to spend more money on development until injury
problems are reviewed by medical experts and resolved.

Nonlethal weapons generally can weaken people if they are hit with the
beam. Some of the weapons can emit short, intense energy pulses that
also can be effective in disabling some electronic devices...

===============================

Details of US microwave-weapon tests revealed
22 July 2005
NewScientist.com news service
From issue 2509 of New Scientist magazine, 22 July 2005, page 26
David Hambling

VOLUNTEERS taking part in tests of the Pentagon's "less-lethal" microwave weapon were banned from wearing glasses or contact lenses due to safety fears. The precautions raise concerns about how safe the Active Denial System (ADS) weapon would be if used in real crowd-control situations.

The ADS fires a 95-gigahertz microwave beam, which is supposed to heat skin and to cause pain but no physical damage ( New Scientist, 27 October 2001, p 26). Little information about its effects has been released, but details of tests in 2003 and 2004 were revealed after Edward Hammond, director of the US Sunshine Project - an organisation campaigning against the use of biological and non-lethal weapons - requested them under the Freedom of Information Act.

The tests were carried out at Kirtland Air Force Base in Albuquerque, New Mexico. Two experiments tested pain tolerance levels, while in a third, a "limited military utility assessment", volunteers played the part of rioters or intruders and the ADS was used to drive them away.

The experimenters banned glasses and contact lenses to prevent possible eye damage to the subjects, and in the second and third tests removed any metallic objects such as coins and keys to stop hot spots being created on the skin. They also checked the volunteers' clothes for certain seams, buttons and zips which might also cause hot spots.

The ADS weapon's beam causes pain within 2 to 3 seconds and it becomes intolerable after less than 5 seconds. People's reflex responses to the pain is expected to force them to move out of the beam before their skin can be burnt.

But Neil Davison, co-ordinator of the non-lethal weapons research project at the University of Bradford in the UK, says controlling the amount of radiation received may not be that simple. "How do you ensure that the dose doesn't cross the threshold for permanent damage?" he asks. "What happens if someone in a crowd is unable, for whatever reason, to move away from the beam? Does the weapon cut out to prevent overexposure?"

During the experiments, people playing rioters put up their hands when hit and were given a 15-second cooling-down period before being targeted again. One person suffered a burn in a previous test when the beam was accidentally used on the wrong power setting.

"What happens if someone is unable to move away from the beam?"

A vehicle-mounted version of ADS called Sheriff could be in service in Iraq in 2006 according to the Department of Defense, and it is also being evaluated by the US Department of Energy for use in defending nuclear facilities. The US marines and police are both working on portable versions, and the US air force is building a system for controlling riots from the air.

CCR Fwd - Action: Maher Arar - No More Secrets!

CCR Fwd - Action: Maher Arar - No More Secrets!

From: ccr@mail.democracyinaction.org


===========================================================

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




NO MORE SECRETS

Dear Friend of CCR,

Innocent CCR client Maher Arar was changing planes at JFK on his way home to Canada from a family vacation when he was detained by the U.S. and 'rendered' to Syria, where he was tortured and held for nearly a year. A Canadian Commission of Inquiry formed to investigate Maher's case released its findings this week: the Commissioner said, "I am able to say categorically that there is no evidence to indicate that Mr. Arar has committed any offence..." Tell your representatives that the Administration’s practice of extraordinary rendition is unlawful, and demand that the U.S. government release all documents related to Maher and clear his name.

We’ve produced a short VIDEO dramatizing Maher's experience you can watch on YouTube. Please give it a look and rate it highly so that more people will see it—if it gets on the front page of their site, half a million people will learn about the abuses our government is perpetrating in our name. Then tell 10 of your friends to watch it too. 'Extraordinary rendition,' like so many of the Bush administration’s practices, depends on secrecy. By sharing this video with as many people as possible, you can help us end the secrecy that enabled Maher's torture and detention.

Maher's story shows how our government's practices in the so-called 'war on terror' can have horrific results. Yet Congress is trying to strip all detainees of the right to challenge their detention and be heard in a court of law. On Wednesday, Representative Edward J. Markey (D-MA) introduced five "resolutions of inquiry" aimed at forcing the release of U.S. government documents related to Maher Arar.

For a more in-depth look at Maher's case, visit No More Secrets , our new website dedicated to countering the secrecy of the Bush administration.

So, to recap:

- Write your elected representatives

- Watch and rate the video

- Visit No More Secrets


Together, we can finally achieve justice for Maher Arar.

Thank you for your support,

Vincent Warren
Executive Director

For more information, please visit our website at www.ccr-ny.org.

Make a donation to help us fight for justice.

See a calendar of events.


To be removed from this list, reply to this message with "unsubscribe" in the subject line.

Bolivian President Evo Morales Speaks

http://boliviarising.blogspot.com/2006/09/evo-at-un-speech-delivered-by.html

Evo at the UN

Speech delivered by the president of the republic, Evo Morales Ayma,
in front of the United Nations General Assembly.

New York, September 19, 2006 .

Thank you, president. Fellow brother and sister presidents, delegates
to the 61 Ordinary Reunion of the United Nations.

It is an enormous satisfaction to be here present, representing my
people, from my homeland, Bolivia and especially the indigenous
movement.

I want to tell you, that after 500 years of be looked down upon, at
times considered to be savages, animals, in some regions condemned to
extermination, thanks to this consciousness and this uprising and to
the struggle for the rights of the peoples I got to, we got here to
repair the historic damage, to repair 500 years of damage.

During the republic, we were equally discriminated, marginalised,
they never took into account this struggle of the peoples for life,
for humanity during the last 20 years, with their application of an
economic model - neoliberalism - that continued the looting of our
natural resources, the privatisation of our basic services.

Convinced, and we are convinced, that the way of privatisation of
basic services is the best way of violating human rights.

And these small considerations oblige me to say the truth here about
the livelihoods of these families, I come to express this sentiment
for the humanity of the peoples, from my people. I come here to
express the suffering, the product of marginalisation, of exclusion, I
come to express above all else, this anti-colonial sentiment of the
peoples that struggle for equality and justice.

I want to say to all of the delegates, Ms president, that in my
country we have begun to search for deep democratic and peaceful
transformations, we are in a stage think of how to refound Bolivia,
refound Bolivia to unite Bolivians, refound Bolivia nor to take
revenge against anyone, despite the fact that we have been kept down
through discrimination, refound Bolivia, above all, to finish with
distain, hatred, against the peoples.

I say this because my mother was commenting to me, saying, that when
she went to the city, she did not have to right to walk in the
principal plazas of the cities of my country, they didn't have the
right to walk on the footpaths.

But happily we have decided to pass over from the social, union,
communal struggle to an electoral struggle so that we ourselves can be
the actors to resolve social problems, economic problems, structural
problems, and we are waging for this Constituent Assembly of
refoundation, and I would like the United Nations to participate in
this process of peaceful and democratic change, which is the best we
can do for these abandoned, marginalised families.

Certainly, many countries have the same problem as my country, a
country, a nation with so much wealth but also with so much poverty,
where the natural resources have historically been stolen, looted,
auctioned off by the neoliberal government, handed over to the
transnationals.

The time has come, now at the head of this struggle of the peoples for
power and land, to recuperate, recuperate those natural resources for
the Bolivian state under the control of the peoples.

And when we speak of recuperating our natural resources, via the dirty
campaign of accusations, they say that the government of Evo Morales
will not respect private property, I want to say to you, in my
government private property will be respected.

It is true that we need investment, we need partners, not bosses, not
owners of our natural resources, we understand perfectly that an
underdeveloped country needs investment, and I want to say, to clarify
in front of all of you some worries, some false accusations; if the
state exercises the property rights of a natural resource such as
natural gas, hydrocarbons, oil, then we don't expel anyone, we don't
confiscate off anyone.

It will be respected, but we guarantee that they recover their
investments and have make an earning, but they will not earn like
before, from the (fat) so we are left not being able to resolve the
social problems in my country later.

I want to say to you within this framework, I don't come here to tell
you how to govern or to threaten a country, or to begin to put
conditions on a country, I only want you as international
organisations, as a state with solidarity, as nations with principals
of reciprocity, of brotherhood, to participate in this process of
democratic change.

We have a great desire, a great interest in their being a conscious of
this class in international forums, international reunions such as the
United Nations to support, to wager on peaceful changes.

All of you know, especially here in North America as well as in
Europe, that there are many Bolivians who go in search of work, before
it use to be the Europeans that invaded Latin American, especially
Bolivia, now it seems that the situation has changed, it is the Latin
American, or the Bolivians, that are invading Europe like they did to
the US before. Why? Because in this conjuncture, at this moment there
is no job creation.

I want to say to all of you that we want to wager for a just trade, a
peoples trade for the people, a trade which resolves the problem of
jobs, that trade for companies is important is clear, but trade for
micro and small producers, for cooperatives, for associations,
collective companies, is more important.

I would like, and this is the one wish I have, that instead of my
sisters and brothers going to Europe, how much better would it be that
products go there and not human beings, and I believe that this has to
do with consciousness in the international community, if we want to
resolve the issue of immigration.

I have information that our sisters and brothers are not going there
to monopolise thousands of hectares as those that came to Latin
America did when they monopolise thousands of hectares, they came to
take over ownership of our wealth, of our resources.

I believe that it is important that within this framework of trade,
trade that is referred to as free trade, even in my country, affected
and eliminated the large producers, the agro-industrialists, imagine
the agreement signed by Colombia with the United States over the Free
Trade Agreement, is already taking away markets from the soya farmers
in Bolivia, from the agro-industrialists in Colombia.

I am convinced that it is important to import what we do not produce
and export what we produce and that this would be a solution to the
economic problem, the problem of employment.

I would like to take advantage of this opportunity, Ms president, to
say that there are also other historical injustices, such as the
criminalisation of the coca leaf. I want to say, this is a green coca
leaf, it is not the white of cocaine, this coca leaf represents Andean
culture, it is a coca leaf that represents the environment and the
hope of our peoples.

It is not possible that the coca leaf is legal for Coca Cola and that
the coca leaf is illegal for other medicinal purposes in our country,
and in the whole world.

We want to say, that it is important that the United Nations recognise
that with the help of North American universities, with European
universities, we have scientifically demonstrated that the coca leaf
does not damage human health.

It is very lamentable that due to customs, to bad customs, that the
coca leaf is derailed into an illegal problem, we are conscious of
that, that is why we say as producers of the coca leaf that there will
not be free coca cultivation, but nor will there be zero coca.

The previously implemented policies, that had conditions imposed,
talked of zero coca, zero coca is like talking of zero Quechuas,
Aymaras, Mojenos, Chiquitanos in my country, this finished with our
government, no matter how underdeveloped our country is, a country
with economic problems which are a product of the looting of our
natural resource wealth.

And we are now here to dignify ourselves, and we have begun to dignify
our country, and within this process of dignifying I want to say, that
the best proposal for the struggle against narco-trafficking has been
voluntary reduction, agreed upon without deaths or injuries.

Happily I have heard the report from the United Nation, which
recognises that this honest, responsible effort, in the struggle
against narco-trafficking, has increased efficiency by 300% as opposed
to confiscations which seize drugs,.

Nevertheless, yesterday I heard a report from the government of the
United States, it says, that they do not accept the cultivation of
coca, and that they are putting conditions on it that modify our
norms.

I want to say with great respect to the government of the United
States , we are not going to change anything, we don't need blackmail
and threats, the so-called certification or decertification in the
fight against narco-trafficking is simply an instrument of
recolonialisation or colonialisation of the Andean countries, that is
unacceptable, that can not be permitted.

I want to say to you that we have, and we need, an alliance to fight
against narco-trafficking, but one that is real and effective, so that
the war on drugs can not be used as an instrument, a pretext, for them
to subjugate the countries of the Andean region, just like they
invented preventative wars to intervene into some countries of the
Middle East.

We need a real fight against narco-trafficking, and I call on the
United Nations, I invite the government of the United States to make
an agreement, an effective alliance to fight against
narco-trafficking, so that the war on drugs is not used as a pretext
to dominate us, or to humiliate us, or to try to establish military
bases. In our country they use the pretext of the fight against
narco-trafficking.

I take use of this opportunity to say that, within this process of
change, we want justice, that justice be carried out is important for
our peoples, but I feel that via the Constituent Assembly we are going
to decolonise the law in order to nationalise justice, real justice.

That the people implicated in the violations of human rights, peoples
threaten with military interventions, there will never be justice
there, we are obliged as presidents, as head of states to dignify
humanity by ending impunity.

In the previous governments in my country, they massacred people that
struggle for their economic demands, for their natural resources, and
it is not possible that perpetuators of genocide, corrupt criminals,
escape in order to live in the United States, in a developed country
such as United States .

I ask with a great deal of respect, expel these perpetuators of
genocide, criminals, corrupt ones that come to live here, if they have
nothing to do with it, why don't they defend themselves in the
Bolivian justice system.

I am obliged, as president, to demand that these authorities be tried
in the Bolivian justice system, and I believe that no country, no head
of state can protect, hid, delinquents, the perpetuators of genocide.

Hopefully with the help of the North American people, hopefully via
international organisations, the people that have done so much
economic damage, damage to human rights, will be tried, given that
they have never respected human rights.

I have a recommendation for the permanent forum of the indigenous
peoples, in front of the debates about the rights of indigenous
peoples, in front of the debates about the rights of indigenous
peoples that are in the subcommission of the rights of indigenous
peoples in the United Nations in Geneva, in the Organisation of
American States, I have information that this debate has reached this
maximum instance of the United Nations.

I want to ask you in the name of the indigenous peoples of the world,
especially of Abyalala, now called America, to urgently approve this
declaration of the rights of indigenous peoples of the world, the
right to self-determination, the right to live in community,
collectively, the right to live in solidarity, in reciprocity, and
fundamentally the right to live in brotherhood.

There are regions were communities live without private property,
there is collective property, the indigenous peoples only want to live
well, not better, to live better is to exploit, is to loot, to rob,
but to live well is to live in brotherhood and that is why it is very
important, president, that the United Nations urgently after the
decade of the indigenous peoples, that this declaration of the rights
of the indigenous peoples, the right to natural resources, the right
to look after the environment, be approved.

Finally president, the indigenous peoples, the poor come especially
from a culture of life and not a culture of war, and this millennium
will really have to be to defend live, to save humanity and if we want
to save humanity we have the obligation to save the planet. The
indigenous peoples live in harmony with mother earth, and not only in
reciprocity, in solidarity, with human beings.

We feel greatly that the politics of hegemonist competitions are
destroying the planet. I feel that all countries, social forces,
international organisms are important, let us begin to debate
truthfully, in order to save the planet, to save humanity.

This new millennium, the millennium that we find ourselves in needs to
be a millennium of life, not of war, a millennium of people and not of
empire, a millennium of justice and equality and that any economic
policy needs to be orientated towards ending, of at least lessening
these so-called asymmetric differences between one country and another
country, those social inequalities.

We are not trying to implement policies that allow the economic
humiliation or economic looting; when they cannot loot according to
the norms, they use troops.

I want to ask with great respect, that it is important to withdraw
troops from Iraq if we want to respect human rights, it is important
to withdraw economic policies that allow the concentration of capital
in only a few hands.

And for this, I feel president, that these events should be historical
in order to change the world and to change economic models,
interventionalist policies. Above all else we want them to be times
that allow us to defend and save humanity

Thanks a lot.

Translated from Bolivian Information Agency


If you wish to be removed from this list simply send an email to:
bolivia_solidarity-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net

To SUBSCRIBE send an email to: bolivia_solidarity-subscribe@lists.riseup.net

========================================================================


* Bolivian President Evo Morales on Latin America, U.S. Foreign Policy and the
Role of the Indigenous People of Bolivia *


-----------------==========================================

TODAY'S DEMOCRACY NOW!:

* Bolivian President Evo Morales on Latin America, U.S. Foreign Policy and
the Role of the Indigenous People of Bolivia *

In a Democracy Now! special, we spend the hour with the president of
Bolivia, Evo Morales. At his inauguration in January, Morales declared the
end of Bolivia's colonial and neo-liberal era. Since then he has moved to
nationalize parts of the country's vast energy reserves and strengthen
Bolivia's ties to Venezuela and Cuba. On Tuesday, Morales spoke for the
first time before the United Nations General Assembly in New York. During
his speech he held up a coca leaf even though it is banned in the United
States and he vowed to never yield to U.S. pressure to criminalize coca
production. In one of his first extended televised interviews in the United
States, Morales discusses U.S. foreign policy, Latin America, the role of
the indigenous people in Bolivia and much more.

Listen/Watch/Read
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/09/22/1323211

Subscribing:
To subscribe to the list, send mail to lawofcolor@lists.riseup.net.

Unsubscribing:
To unsubscribe from the list, send mail to lawofcolor-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net,
where listname is the name of the list. Alternately, you can login, click 'Your
Subscriptions', click on the name of the list, then click 'Unsubscribe'.

Thursday, September 21, 2006

101 Days in Prison for Protesting for Peace by Sara Rich

101 Days in Prison for Protesting for Peace by Sara Rich

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/092006B.shtml

Figures showing Iraq violence drop not complete

Figures showing Iraq violence drop not complete

By Patrick Quinn
Associated Press


BAGHDAD, Iraq — The U.S. military did not count people killed by
bombs, mortars, rockets or other mass attacks — including suicide
bombings — when it reported a dramatic drop in the number of murders
around Baghdad last month, the U.S. command said Monday.

The decision to include only victims of drive-by shootings and those
killed by torture and execution, usually at the hands of death
squads, allowed U.S. officials to argue that a security crackdown
that began in the capital on Aug. 7 had more than halved the city’s
murder rate.


But the types of slayings, including suicide bombings, that the U.S.
excluded from the category of “murder” were not made explicit at the
time. That led to considerable confusion after Iraqi Health Ministry
figures showed that 1,536 people had died violently around Baghdad in
August, nearly the same number as in July.

The figures raise serious questions about the success of the security
operation launched by the U.S.-led coalition. When they released the
murder rate figures, U.S. officials and their Iraqi counterparts were
eager to show progress in restoring security in Baghdad, at a time
when the country looks to be on the verge of civil war.

At the end of August, the top U.S. military spokesman in Iraq, Maj.
Gen. William B. Caldwell, said violence had dropped significantly
because of the operation. Caldwell said “attacks in Baghdad were well
below the monthly average for July. Since Aug. 7, the murder rate in
Baghdad dropped 52 percent from the daily rate for July.”

Caldwell, however, did not make the key distiction that the rate he
was referring to excluded a significant part of the relentless daily
violence that tears through Baghdad. On Monday for example, at least
20 of the 26 people who died in the capital were killed in bombings.

“These comments were intended to highlight some specific indicators
of progress and were never stated in relation to broader casualty
figures,” U.S. military spokesman Lt. Col. Barry Johnson said Monday.

He added that Caldwell “used murders and executions specifically
because they are a key indicator of sectarian-related violence.”

Johnson said other types of violence that are recoded by the military
as “indicators for calculating casualties” include roadside bombs
called improvised explosive devices, or IEDs, mortars and rockets,
small-arms fire “such as when used to fire in crowds after an IED
attack versus an individual being murdered,” car bombs — known as
VBIED’s — and suicide attacks.

Under the military’s definition, murders include civilians killed
“who are specifically targeted,” in drive-by shootings and stabbing
for example, but do not include executions or “those killed in
indirect fire, IED, VBIED, or suicide attacks, all of which may or
may not be related to sectarian violence.”

Executions include people who have been held, tortured and then
killed and are considerd to be motivated by ethnic or sectarian
reasons — unless they are some form of reprisal killing or related to
crime.

Johnson would not provide the figures used to calculate the
percentages and said the military would not give detailed information
about trends because it could provide “our enemy information they
need to adjust their tactics and procedures to be more effective
against us.”

He added that although the military collected its violence data from
as many sources as possible and used a steady methodology, “we do not
claim our information represents every possible victim of violence.”

The confusion over numbers underscores the difficulty of obtaining
accurate death tolls in Iraq, which lacks the data reporting and
tracking systems of most modern nations. When top Iraqi political
officials cite death numbers, they often refuse to say where the
numbers came from.

The Health Ministry, which tallies civilian deaths, relies on reports
from government hospitals and morgues. The Interior Ministry, which
command Iraqi’s police, compiles figures from police stations, while
the Defense Ministry reports deaths only among army soldiers and
insurgents killed in combat.

The United Nations keeps its own count, based largely on reports from
the Baghdad morgue and the Health Ministry. A U.N. official said it
would be announcing August figures later.

Controversy over civilian death figures in Iraq dates back to the
U.S. invasion and has continued. Some believe that figures are
manipulated politically.

In December 2003, the Health Ministry stopped releasing civilian
casualty figures for several months.

Last year, Baghdad morgue director Faik Baker fled to Jordan after he
said he came under pressure to not report deaths — especially those
caused by death squads.

IPA - End of Habeas Corpus?

courtesy Institute for Public Accuracy

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Institute for Public Accuracy
915 National Press Building, Washington, D.C . 20045
(202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * ipa@accuracy.org
___________________________________________________

PM Monday, September 18, 2006

End of Habeas Corpus?

While the Warner-Graham-McCain bill has gotten substantial attention
with regards to its Geneva conventions provisions, the Center for
Constitutional Rights has criticized both the bill and the
administration's proposal as gutting habeas corpus.

McCain and Graham were questioned separately about this yesterday, by
Sam Husseini of the Institute for Public Accuracy, as they left the
studios of Sunday morning talk shows in Washington. McCain replied
that he was not familiar with those provisions of the legislation.

When Graham was asked if the bill, as the Center for Constitutional
Rights has charged, "would prevent anyone taken into U.S. custody --
anywhere in the world, past, present or future, innocent or not --
from ever having their case heard in a court of law," the South
Carolina senator replied: "That is a complete false statement."

Graham added: "Every person tried as a war criminal will now be able
to appeal their conviction if there is one through our federal court
system. ... Everywhere we hold someone there are rules in place to
appeal their status as enemy combatants."

For video and transcript of the remarks by McCain and Graham, see:
< http://www.husseini.org/content/2006/09/questioning_mcc.html >.

MICHAEL RATNER, via Mahdis Keshavarz, mahdis@riptideonline.com ,
http://ccr-ny.org
President of the Center for Constitutional Rights, Ratner said
today: "The Warner-Graham-McCain bill denies habeas corpus to all
aliens held outside the United States and currently in U.S. custody.
And 'outside' includes Guantanamo.
"However in the case of those who have been found to be unlawful
enemy combatants by Combatant Status Review Tribunal (combatant
status review panels used at Guantanamo) it gives a meaningless court
of appeals 'review' -- a review that examines whether or not the U.S.
complied with its own procedures -- but not ... a real court hearing
with factual development as habeas corpus requires.
"For those aliens detained outside the U.S. that have not had
CSRT hearings -- the high majority -- in facilities like Bagram in
Afghanistan, the Warner bill simply abolished habeas or any other
court review.
"The consequences are breathtaking. The U.S. can pick up any
alien, even a legal permanent resident in the U.S., and take them to
an off-shore prison and hold them forever without any kind of court
hearing.
"While all the attention on this legislation has focused on
Geneva conventions and military commissions, the Warner alternative,
like the administration bill, authorizes lifelong detention without
habeas or any genuine review whatsoever."

P. SABIN WILLETT, sabin.willett@bingham.com
Willett is a partner at the law firm Bingham McCutchen. One of
his clients, Abu Bakker Qassim, who was imprisoned at Guantanamo from
2002 to May 2006, had an oped in the New York Times on Sunday; see:
< http://www.iht.com/articles/2006/09/18/opinion/edqassim.php >.
Willett said today: "Sen. Graham refers to a provision in the
Senate bill that gives the court of appeals a review of 'enemy
combatant' findings made by the military's Combatant Status Review
Tribunals. But the devil is in the details. The Senate bill limits
the court's review to whether the CSRT [has] followed its own
rules. ... The irony of the new bill is that it would give more
rights to Khaled Sheikh Muhammed, who stands accused of murdering
nearly 3,000, than to men who've never been charged, and never will
be charged, with anything.
"Judge Hens Green, the only judge to have looked closely at these
CSRTs, roundly condemned them as arbitrary more than a year ago. The
CSRTs branded as 'enemy combatant' not just enemy soldiers taken on
the battlefield, but all kinds of people who were never soldiers at
all. They based their findings on secret evidence and reached
contradictory and inexplicable results."

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167




_________________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
public@lists.accuracy.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
public-unsubscribe@lists.accuracy.org

For all list information and functions, including changing
your subscription mode and options, visit the Web page:
http://lists.accuracy.org/lists/info/public

At United Nations, Chile's President Recalls Letelier Murder

Prensa Latina, Havana http://www.plenglish.com

At United Nations, Chile's President Recalls Letelier Murder

United Nations, Sep 20 (Prensa Latina) Speaking to the United Nations
Wednesday, Chilean President Michelle Bachelet made an unusual and
emotional recollection of the assassination in Washington of her country´s
former Foreign Minister Orlando Letelier, and stressed that her government
rejects impunity.

Letelier, who was also defense minister during President Salvador Allende´s
Unidad Popular government, was the victim of a bomb attack in DC 30 years
ago by terrorists of Cuban origin.

Orlando Bosch, who lives in Miami under the protection of US authorities,
is among those terrorists of Cuban origin involved in the attack,
coordinated with the espionage service of coup Gen. Augusto Pinochet´s
dictatorship.

Bosch, together with Luis Posada Carriles, also of Cuban origin, planned
the terrorist bombing of a Cubana de Aviacion passenger plane in full
flight, killing all 73 aboard. Posada Carriles is also in the United States.

Bachelet declared that nothing justifies that human rights violation. Chile
rejects impunity, she stressed.

The first woman to assume power in that South American country recounted to
the international community the brutal terrorist action against the ex
minister of overthrown President Allende, when the human rights issue was
raised during the discussions.

hr/ccs/iom/tgj

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Via NY Transfer News Collective * All the News that Doesn't Fit

http://www.blythe.org/index.html

Hugo Chavez | Address to the United Nations

Hugo Chavez | Address to the United Nations
http://www.commondreams.org/views06/0920-22.htm

Wednesday, September 20, 2006

action alert - Fight Frist's Combined Spying, Tribunals Bill

courtesy working for change - act for change! [edited]

Tell Your Senators: Don't Let the White House Legalize Torture!

action alert from
ActForChange.com - the resource center for people with progressive values.

Tell Your Senators: Don't Let the White House Legalize Torture

To take action on this issue, click this link or copy and paste it into your
browser:

http://www.workingforchange.com/activism/action.cfm?itemid=21387

===================================================================

courtesy Institute for Public Accuracy

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Institute for Public Accuracy
915 National Press Building, Washington, D.C. 20045
(202) 347-0020 * http://www.accuracy.org * ipa@accuracy.org
___________________________________________________

PM Monday, September 18, 2006

End of Habeas Corpus?

While the Warner-Graham-McCain bill has gotten substantial attention
with regards to its Geneva conventions provisions, the Center for
Constitutional Rights has criticized both the bill and the
administration's proposal as gutting habeas corpus.

McCain and Graham were questioned separately about this yesterday, by
Sam Husseini of the Institute for Public Accuracy, as they left the
studios of Sunday morning talk shows in Washington. McCain replied
that he was not familiar with those provisions of the legislation.

When Graham was asked if the bill, as the Center for Constitutional
Rights has charged, "would prevent anyone taken into U.S. custody --
anywhere in the world, past, present or future, innocent or not --
from ever having their case heard in a court of law," the South
Carolina senator replied: "That is a complete false statement."

Graham added: "Every person tried as a war criminal will now be able
to appeal their conviction if there is one through our federal court
system. ... Everywhere we hold someone there are rules in place to
appeal their status as enemy combatants."

For video and transcript of the remarks by McCain and Graham, see:
.

MICHAEL RATNER, via Mahdis Keshavarz, mahdis@riptideonline.com,
http://ccr-ny.org
President of the Center for Constitutional Rights, Ratner said
today: "The Warner-Graham-McCain bill denies habeas corpus to all
aliens held outside the United States and currently in U.S. custody.
And 'outside' includes Guantanamo.
"However in the case of those who have been found to be unlawful
enemy combatants by Combatant Status Review Tribunal (combatant
status review panels used at Guantanamo) it gives a meaningless court
of appeals 'review' -- a review that examines whether or not the U.S.
complied with its own procedures -- but not ... a real court hearing
with factual development as habeas corpus requires.
"For those aliens detained outside the U.S. that have not had
CSRT hearings -- the high majority -- in facilities like Bagram in
Afghanistan, the Warner bill simply abolished habeas or any other
court review.
"The consequences are breathtaking. The U.S. can pick up any
alien, even a legal permanent resident in the U.S., and take them to
an off-shore prison and hold them forever without any kind of court
hearing.
"While all the attention on this legislation has focused on
Geneva conventions and military commissions, the Warner alternative,
like the administration bill, authorizes lifelong detention without
habeas or any genuine review whatsoever."

P. SABIN WILLETT, sabin.willett@bingham.com
Willett is a partner at the law firm Bingham McCutchen. One of
his clients, Abu Bakker Qassim, who was imprisoned at Guantanamo from
2002 to May 2006, had an oped in the New York Times on Sunday; see:
.
Willett said today: "Sen. Graham refers to a provision in the
Senate bill that gives the court of appeals a review of 'enemy
combatant' findings made by the military's Combatant Status Review
Tribunals. But the devil is in the details. The Senate bill limits
the court's review to whether the CSRT [has] followed its own
rules. ... The irony of the new bill is that it would give more
rights to Khaled Sheikh Muhammed, who stands accused of murdering
nearly 3,000, than to men who've never been charged, and never will
be charged, with anything.
"Judge Hens Green, the only judge to have looked closely at these
CSRTs, roundly condemned them as arbitrary more than a year ago. The
CSRTs branded as 'enemy combatant' not just enemy soldiers taken on
the battlefield, but all kinds of people who were never soldiers at
all. They based their findings on secret evidence and reached
contradictory and inexplicable results."

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167




_________________________________________________________________
You received this message as a subscriber on the list:
public@lists.accuracy.org
To be removed from the list, send any message to:
public-unsubscribe@lists.accuracy.org

For all list information and functions, including changing
your subscription mode and options, visit the Web page:
http://lists.accuracy.org/lists/info/public


==========================================

courtesy - a Friend of the Cuban Five! [edited]

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Free the Five! September 23 march on White House

The march will gather at 11 am, at the Department of Justice, 10th and Pennsylvania N.W. After a morning rally we will march to the White House for a picket there. Then a 2:00 pm forum will take place at George Washington University’s Funger Hall, 2201 G St.,N.W.

...

In NYC: Buses will be leaving early Saturday morning, Sept. 23, from Union Square and Harlem early Saturday the 23rd and return late the same evening. Call 212-694-8720 to get your bus tickets.

============================================

Fight Frist's Combined Spying, Tribunals Bill

courtesy ACLU - [edited]

Call your Senators today and ask them to reject this effort to grab more unchecked power to search Americans’ homes secretly and listen to Americans’ conversations without the individual warrants required by the Constitution. Or, read more first.

----------------------------------------------------------------
1. Fill your information into the form below.
2. Click "Go" — the contact information of your Senators will appear below.
3. To assist us in evaluating the effectiveness of our campaign, we would greatly appreciate it if you would log the results of your call with us today. Filling out our brief form takes only a moment and gives us extremely valuable information about your experience. While we would greatly appreciate your participation, this step is not required.
To look up your senator's phone number, please enter your ZIP Code.
----------

Here are some talking points for your telephone calls:

I strongly oppose Senator Frist’s bill, the “Terrorist Tracking, Identification, and Prosecution Act of 2006,” (S. 3886).
This legislation would combine the Cheney-Specter Bill to allow warrantless spying on Americans with legislation that would gut the Geneva Conventions and allow the use of secret evidence to convict detainees.
It would even allow the death penalty based on evidence detainees cannot see and from evidence obtained as the result of waterboarding, threats of death, and other horrific forms of abuse.
The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which this bill would needlessly weaken, already gives the government all the tools it needs to protect us from terrorists. It even allows the government to start spying on suspected terrorists without a warrant as long as it seeks one after the fact.
I support the Specter-Feinstein bill (S. 3001), because it restores due process by re-affirming the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act as the only legal way to spy on people inside the United States.
Civil liberties and the war on terrorism are not mutually exclusive. When fighting the war on terror, you have the duty to keep me both safe and free by supporting and introducing alternatives to the Administration’s proposals, such as S. 3001 that protect due process and the rule of law.

==============================================================================

courtesy - Amnesty International [edited]

Dear Most Respected NLG TUPOCC member,
Today, hundreds of activists like me across America are calling our Representatives and Senators. We’re asking them to oppose President Bush’s new, alarming legislation that would sanction unfair trials, indefinite detention and immunity for people who may have engaged in torture or cruel treatment. Please join us .
==========================================================================

courtesy National Immigrant Solidarity Network via lawofcolor@lists.riseup.net

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Action Alert! National Call-In Day to STOP Congress from Passing Anti-Immigrant
Bills!

September 20 National Call-In Day!

National Immigrant Solidarity Network
http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org


On Wednesday September 20, the U.S. House will be discuss and voting several
racist anti-immigrant legislation (see above). After last week the passage of
last week's (9/14) Secure Fence Act of 2006 H.R. 6061. http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2006/roll446.xml
the anti-immigrant forces in Washington D.C. want to push their enforcement-only
immigrant agendas before November election. And we need to mobilize to stop it!

On Wednesday September 20, we urge you to CALL, FAX AND MAIL your elected
officials, SAY NO TO THE RACIST ANTI-IMMIGRANT BILLS:

H.R. 4844 - Federal Election Integrity Act of 2006 ("Voter ID bill")
H.R. 6089 - Illegal Immigrant Deterrence Act
H.R. 6090 - Immigration Enforcement Act
H.R. 6091 - Border Security Enhancement Act


Talking Point (by: New American Opportunity Campaign)
"Congress should stop the piecemeal, enforcement-only approach to immigration
reform. I support a comprehensive bill that reunites families, legalizes the
undocumented population, and provides future immigrants with a safe and legal
way to live and work in the U.S."

or we'll not vote for you at the November election!


To find your House members, please visit the following site:

http://www.house.gov/writerep/


Here's the suggest key persons to call:

1) We need call Democrats who had vote for the anti-immigrant, ask them DO THE
RIGHT WAY BY VOTE NO TO THE BILLS!

Andrews (D-NJ) - Baird (D-WA) - Barrow (D-GA) - Bean (D-IL)
Berkley (D-NV) - Berry (D-AR) - Bishop (GA) (D-GA) - Bishop (NY) (D-NY)
Boren (D-OK) - Boswell (D-IA) - Boucher (D-VA) - Boyd (D-FL)
Brown (OH) (D-OH) - Brown, Corrine (D-FL) - Capuano (D-MA)
Cardoza (D-CA) - Chandler (D-KY) - Cooper (D-TN) - Costa (D-CA)
Costello (D-IL) - Cramer (D-AL) - Davis (AL) (D-AL) - Davis (TN) (D-TN)
DeFazio (D-OR) - Delahunt (D-MA) - Edwards (D-TX) - Etheridge (D-NC)
Ford (D-TN) - Frank (MA) (D-MA) - Gordon (D-TN) - Herseth (D-SD)
Holden (D-PA) - Hooley (D-OR) - Israel (D-NY) - Kanjorski (D-PA)
Kildee (D-MI) - Kind (D-WI) - Lipinski (D-IL) - Lynch (D-MA)
Maloney (D-NY) - Marshall (D-GA) - Matheson (D-UT) - McCarthy (D-NY)
McIntyre (D-NC) - Melancon (D-LA) - Miller (NC) (D-NC) - Mollohan (D-WV)
Moore (KS) (D-KS) - Moran (VA) (D-VA) - Pascrell (D-NJ)
Peterson (MN) (D-MN) - Pomeroy (D-ND) - Rahall (D-WV)
Ross (D-AR) - Ruppersberger (D-MD) - Ryan (OH) (D-OH)
Skelton (D-MO) - Smith (WA) (D-WA) - Spratt (D-SC)
Stupak (D-MI) - Tanner (D-TN) - Taylor (MS) (D-MS)
Weiner (D-NY) - Wexler (D-FL)


2) And here's the lists of Pro-Immigrant Republicans who had been identify by
the anti-immigrant organization, we need to call them to thanks for their
pro-immigrant support and urge them VOTE NO THE BILLS!

John McCain (R-AZ) 202-224-2235
Lindsay Graham (R-SC) 202-224-5972
Mike DeWine (R-OH) 202-224-2315
Arlen Specter (R-PA) 202-224-4254
John Warner (R-VA) 202-224-2023
Richard Lugar (R-IN) 202-224-4814
Robert Bennett (R-UT) 202-224-5444
Sam Brownback (R-KS) 202-224-6521
Lincoln Chaffee (R-RI) 202-224-2921
Norm Coleman (R-MN) 202-224-5641
Judd Gregg (R-NH) 202-224-3324
Chuck Hagel (R-NE) 202-224-4224
Mitch McConnell (R-KY) 202-224-2541
Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) 202-224-6665
Susan Collins (R-ME) 202-224-2523
Larry Craig (R-ID) 202-224-2752
Pete Domenici (R-NM) 202-224-6621
Mel Martinez (R-FL) 202-224-3041
Gordon Smith (R-OR) 202-224-3753
Olympia Snowe (R-ME) 202-224-5344
Ted Stevens (R-AK) 202-224-3004
George Voinovich (R-OH) 202-224-3353


Other Useful Links

National Council of La Raza
http://www.nclr.org

National Immigration Forum
http://www.immigrationforum.org

New American Opportunity Campaign
http://www.cirnow.org

National Network of Immigrant & Refugee Rights
http://www.NNIRR.org

=====================================================
Background Information About
H.R. 4844, H.R. 6089, H.R. 6090 H.R. 6091


Congress Aims to Require Voter ID H.R. 4844

Friends,

This week (9/20 Wed and 9/21 Thurs), the House of Representatives is poised to
consider the "Voter ID bill" H.R. 4844, the Federal Election Integrity Act of
2006.

The VOTER ID bill aims to decrease the number of citizens able to vote by
requiring all citizens to show proof of citizenship in order to vote. Millions
of Americans, who do not have the identification and proof of citizenship that
the bill requires -- the elderly, the disabled, Native Americans and other
minorities- will be profoundly impacted by this legislation. H.R. 4844 will do
far more to suppress turnout and intimidate voters than to prevent voter fraud,
as the proponents of the Voter ID bill claim. Millions of Americans will be
denied their right to vote because the House Republicans are rushing this bill
to floor to address a problem that does not really exist.


MORE ANTI-IMMIGRATION BILLS (H.R. 6089, H.R. 6090 H.R. 6091 )
This week, we also expect the Republican Leadership to bring up a series of
border security bills. It is odd that, that as the election nears, Republicans
would pick border security as a theme, with their "Border Security Now" agenda -
thereby highlighting an issue on which they don't have a single accomplishment.
If the House Republicans were serious, they would have moved forward with a
House-Senate conference on realistic and bipartisan border security/immigration
reform legislation - instead of stalling any progress with sham "hearings" or
ineffective legislation.

Below is a list of the upcoming border security bills. On Wednesday (9/20) &
Thursday (9/21), the House will meet at 10:00 am for legislative business. On
Friday, the House will meet at 9:00 am.

H.R. 6054 - Military Commissions Act (Rep. Hunter - Armed Services) (Subject to
a Rule)

H.R. 4844 - Voter ID Bill (Rep. Hyde - House Administration) (Subject to a Rule)

H.R. 6089 - Illegal Immigrant Deterrence Act (Rep. Sensenbrenner - Judiciary)
(Subject to a Rule)

H.R. 6090 -Immigration Enforcement Act (Rep. Sensenbrenner - Judiciary) (Subject
to a Rule)

H.R. 6091 - Border Security Enhancement Act (Rep. Sensenbrenner - Judiciary)

Stop the Sneak Attack on our Fundamental Values
(by: Rights Working Groups)

Today and tomorrow Congress is trying to rush three bills through the House and
then on to the Senate before you notice what they have done. Why? Because all
three bills are designed to hand over unchecked power to the Administration.

Call your representative and Senators now and tell them to stop this sneak
attack on our fundamental values.

HR 6089 – Expands the Administration’s ability to lock people up indefinitely
with no end in sight. This comes after the Supreme Court ruled that they are
required to eliminate this practice.

HR 6090 – Allows the Administration’s Attorney General to simply “designate”
people as gang members without a trial, without giving them their day in court.
It would also make it easier in any immigration case for the administration to
continue violating the law even after it has lost in court.

HR 6091- Gives the Administration’s Department of Homeland Security the
unchecked power to deport people without their day in court.
Congress plans to sneak these provisions into budget bills which almost always
pass. They are trying to make an end-run around the courts, around the
constitution, and now around the legislative process.

9/14: Immigration Policy Update
National Immigration Forum

9/14: CLEAR Act on House agenda; information and ideas
National Immigration Forum

9/15: URGENT: Stop U.S. Authorization of Indefinite Detention
Center for Constitutional Rights





Analysis from Immigrant Legal Resource Center



The House Republican leadership is at it again. Unwilling to fix our broken
immigration system, they instead are focusing on moving through the House of
Representatives several measures that will only lead to more dysfunction. These
measures will not cure what is wrong with our immigration system. Far from it!




The American public supports comprehensive immigration reform. Such reform
would bring families together, create a legal pathway for people to come to the
United States in the future, give U.S. employers the workers they need, and help
secure our nation.



What is House Republican leadership offering us instead? Failed solutions that
will only perpetuate a broken system. These bills, with their titles changed to
accurately reflect what they really would do, offer still more examples of this
failed approach. The House of Representatives is expected to vote on these
measures this week.



H.R. 6089: The Unsafe Streets and Government Unfettered Authority Act



Despite the opposition of state and local police nationwide, HR 6089 would
encourage state and local law enforcement agencies to investigate, identify,
apprehend, arrest, detain and transfer to Federal custody immigrants they find
in the U.S. State and local police oppose this measure because they know that
if they act as immigration enforcement agents they would undermine their ability
to keep communities safe and, in the process, destroy years of community
policing. Immigrants and their family members will be afraid to report crimes,
fires, and suspicious activity out of fear of exposing themselves, families or
neighbors. Crimes inevitably will be left unsolved and the safety of entire
communities will be compromised.



H.R. 6089 also would give immigration authorities nearly unfettered authority to
indefinitely detain immigrants, thereby posing serious constitutional concerns.
The indefinite detention provision sidesteps two Supreme Court cases and
actually fashions through legislation a means by which DHS could continue to
indefinitely detain certain aliens. The provision would subject many more people
to indefinite detention including asylum seekers fleeing persecution.
Legislation is not needed on this issue: DHS should follow the humane process
laid out by the Supreme Court which sets up a 90 day review process for
individuals who cannot be removed to their home country. Over 1000 individuals
are subjected to indefinite detention at the present time. In some cases, it is
not possible for the government to deport these individuals because the U.S.
does not maintain diplomatic relations with country of origin. Detaining people
indefinitely, with no end in sight, will cost the government millions of dollars
at taxpayer expense. Instead of detaining these individuals, Congress could use
secure alternatives to detention programs that are more cost effective and
humane.



HR 6090: The Anti Right to Association and Government Unaccountability Act



Under H.R. 6090, immigrants who have never committed any crimes whatsoever and
who have obeyed all of our laws can be deported, denied admission and the
ability to obtain lawful status, subjected to mandatory detention, and denied
all forms of protection such as asylum and temporary protected status, simply
because the Attorney General has determined through a secret process that they
are associated with a street gang. Through this secret process, the Attorney
General, does not have to provide notice or an opportunity to be heard to those
designated, and can designate any formal or informal group of three or more
persons who have committed two or more enumerated gang crimes a “criminal street
gang.” As a result of this designation, many immigrants who never committed or
supported a single criminal act (but are designated to have associated with this
“gang”) may be punished severely for exercising their right to association: they
may be deported to a country where they face interrogation, torture, detention
and even death.

H.R. 6090 also changes the rules for immigration cases in federal court so that
immigrants will have a harder time getting relief. HR 6090 would make it easier
for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to continue violating the law in
any immigration case even after the agency has lost in court. Plaintiffs in
immigration cases will find it difficult to force DHS to obey the law even after
they have proven in court that they have been wronged by the DHS. This bill also
would not allow judges to grant relief in all immigration cases unless they
attach a written explanation of the impact of granting the pardon. Finally, it
would impose overly short time limits on courts attempting to grant pardons to
immigrants, regardless of the complexity of the case.



HR 6091: Government Unchecked Power Act

HR 6019 includes a provision that would allow the Administration to remove
people from inside the United States without a court hearing, after a low-level
agency official makes certain findings. It eliminates judicial hearings for
immigrants, including legal permanent residents, who are found inadmissible and
who are not eligible for any relief. Such expedited removal authority would
allow a DHS officer, instead of a trained immigration judge, to make complicated
legal determinations about whether a person is subject to removal and/or is a
citizen. Such authority would lead to the increased risk of improper or mistaken
deportations of non-citizens and even U.S. citizens: the expedited procedures
are insufficient to determine who is a citizen of the United States. Expedited
removal would endanger asylum seekers, victims of trafficking and domestic
violence, and children because under these summary procedures there will be many
incorrect determinations and people will be sent back to countries where they
face persecution.


=====================================================

National Immigrant Solidarity Network
No Immigrant Bashing! Support Immigrant Rights!
webpage: http://www.ImmigrantSolidarity.org
mail: info@ImmigrantSolidarity.org
New York: (212)330-8172
Los Angeles: (213)403-0131
Washington D.C.: (202)595-8990

Please consider making a donation to the important work of National Immigrant
Solidarity Network

Send check pay to:
National Immigrant Solidarity Network/AFGJ

and mail to:
ActionLA / The Peace Center
8124 West 3rd Street, Suite 104
Los Angeles, California 90048
(All donations are tax deductible)

*to join the immigrant Solidarity Network daily news litserv, send e-mail to:
isn-subscribe@lists.riseup.net
or visit: http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/isn

*a monthly ISN monthly Action Alert! listserv, go to webpage
http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/isn-digest


Please join our following listservs:
Asian American Labor Activism Alert! Listserv, send-e-mail to:
api-la-subscribe@lists.riseup.net
or visit: http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/api-la


NYC Immigrant Alert!: New York, New Jersey and Pennsylvania areas immigrant
workers information and alerts, send e-mail to: nyc-immigrantalert-subscribe@lists.riseup.net
or visit: http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/nyc-immigrantalert


US-Mexico Border Information: No Militarization of Borders! Support Immigrant
Rights! send e-mail to: Border01-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
or visit: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Border01/

Subscribing:
To subscribe to the list, send mail to awofcolor%40lists.riseup.net".

Unsubscribing:
To unsubscribe from the list, send mail to lawofcolor-unsubscribe@lists.riseup.net,
where listname is the name of the list. Alternately, you can login, click 'Your
Subscriptions', click on the name of the list, then click 'Unsubscribe'.